Katrina - Editorial assessments are NOT kind.

(Cross-posted at Daily Kos)

I don't know why but I can't help but make a comparison between Katrina and 9/11.  Sometimes the comparison draws a contrast.

In the days and weeks following 9/11, the mainstream media, Congresspeople and even average Americans were hesitant to ask the tough questions.  Reflections on whether it could have been prevented were taboo.  Rightly or wrongly, many people got behind the flag, our President and our government in the aftermath.

No so with Katrina.  The analysis of what wasn't done before Katrina has begun and criticism of actions both before and after Katrina struck are prominent in the mainstream print and televised media.  Already I've seen CNN's Miles O'Brien ask a question of Haley Barbour (Governor of Mississippi) as to whether or not he (Barbour) was angry at the lack of Federal response.  Barbour, Republican to the end, was visibly outraged and peeved.

Volvo Liberal posted a diary featuring a New York Times editorial.  I decided to check other major newpapers and see what their editorial columnists were saying today.

What I found follows after the fold.

Just an editorial note - I have maintained a database since the election of major market newpapers across the country.  I took a sampling of these today due to time constraints.  Each editorial is referenced and only an excerpt is provided to ensure that copyrights aren't violated.

The Boston Globe - Catastrophe

But even before engineers repair the damaged levees and begin the long process of pumping New Orleans out, the city's residents deserve to know whether human actions or inactions bear a share of responsibility for this catastrophe. There is strong evidence that they do and that the entire Gulf area will be at risk of future Katrinas if policies and priorities are not changed.

The New York Times - Waiting for a Leader (also featured in this diary)

George W. Bush gave one of the worst speeches of his life yesterday, especially given the level of national distress and the need for words of consolation and wisdom. In what seems to be a ritual in this administration, the president appeared a day later than he was needed. He then read an address of a quality more appropriate for an Arbor Day celebration: a long laundry list of pounds of ice, generators and blankets delivered to the stricken Gulf Coast. He advised the public that anybody who wanted to help should send cash, grinned, and promised that everything would work out in the end.

The Washington Post - The Great Flood of '05

But over the longer term, it will be extremely important to better understand the causes of this long-predicted disaster and to determine what, if anything, could have prevented it. This administration has consistently played down the possibility of environmental disaster, in Louisiana and everywhere else. The president's most recent budgets have actually proposed reducing funding for flood prevention in the New Orleans area, and the administration has long ignored Louisiana politicians' requests for more help in protecting their fragile coast, the destruction of which meant there was little to slow down the hurricane before it hit the city. It is inappropriate to "blame" anyone for a natural disaster. But given how frequently the impact of this one was predicted, and given the scale of the economic and human catastrophe that has resulted, it is certainly fair to ask questions about disaster preparations. Congress, when it returns, should rise above the blame game and instead probe the state of the nation's preparation for handling major natural catastrophes, particularly those that threaten crucial regions of the country.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution - No plan ever made to help New Orleans' most vulnerable

Each time you hear a federal, state or city official explain what he or she is doing to help New Orleans, consider the opening paragraphs of a July 24 story in the New Orleans Times-Picayune.

"City, state and federal emergency officials are preparing to give the poorest of New Orleans' poor a historically blunt message: In the event of a major hurricane, you're on your own."

--snip--

And yet apparently there was no emergency plan and no resources to evacuate "the carless, the homeless, the aged and infirm."

In this era when we are a nation at risk of terrorism and natural disasters, we can only hope that what is happening in New Orleans is not built into the fabric of our national homeland security policy. We should provide security for everyone, including the poor, aged and infirm.

The Chicago Sun-Times - The New Orleans tragedy...

Watch for a public uproar when statistics show how many impoverished citizens of New Orleans were killed by Hurricane Katrina because they couldn't afford to flee.

--snip--

"We knew the hurricane was going to hit New Orleans and Mississippi hard. Why didn't we send buses in to get the poor people out before disaster hit? We spend millions on recovery and rescue AFTERWARDS . . . when we could have alleviated so much death BEFORE?"

The Houston Chronicle - We saw it coming, yet we still didn't prepare

No one can say they didn't see it coming.

For years before Hurricane Katrina roared ashore Monday morning, devastating the Gulf Coast, officials from Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama have been warning about their vulnerability to the storms that swirl menacingly in the Gulf of Mexico every hurricane season.

Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation.

--snip--

"If we had been investing resources in restoring our coast, it wouldn't have prevented the storm but the barrier islands would have absorbed some of the tidal surge," said Rep. Bobby Jindal, R-La. "People's lives are at stake. We need to take this more seriously."

The Los Angeles Times - The Crescent City blues

Certainly the sacrifices of New Orleans need a kind of national reckoning, one that would enable the people to see the president who forgot to care for what he is. Every great disaster -- the Blitz, 9/11, the tsunami -- has a political dimension. The dilatory performance of George Bush during the past week has been outrageous. Almost as unbelievable as Katrina itself is the fact that the leader of the free world has been outshone by the elected leaders of a region renowned for governmental ineptitude.

--snip--

This president who flew away Monday to fundraisers in the West while the hurricane blew away entire towns in coastal Mississippi is very much his father's son. George H.W. Bush couldn't quite connect to the victims of Hurricane Andrew, nor did he mind being photographed tooling his golf cart around Kennebunkport while American troops died in the first Iraq war. After preemptively declaring a state of emergency, the younger Bush seemed equally determined to show his successors how to vacation through an apocalypse.

Finally, a few cartoons I found in my traverse of MSM editorials on Katrina...

These questions are totally righteous IMO.  The reality is that a natural disaster or terrorist attack could occur at any time.  It is not an act of Bush-hating to question how this went so badly and to try to plan so that improvements are made in the future.

An interested editorial I read in The LA Times talked about preparedness in the advent of a major earthquake.  They are asking those types of questions, thinking about a catastrphe in their region and their ability to respond.  The Miami Herald had an article on preparedness for another category 5 of Katrina's size and duration and indicated that Andrew, while strong, was much smaller and went through more quickly.  They are now thinking about the devastation that could be wrought on South Florida with a Katrina-like storm and, hopefully, planning ahead.

New Orleans and the whole Gulf region deserved better.  Those people deserved better - the ones that survived and the ones that didn't.  Asking question and issuing criticisms will help us step forward in the next tragedy.


Display:


Excellent work. (none / 0)

On point.
by Thresholder on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 12:07:07 PM EST

Fantastic round-up! (none / 0)

It's good to know that the M$M may finally hold Bush accountable for something. If the Democrats play their cards right, a very questionable assumption, they can hang this anvil around the neck of the whole Republican Party.

On CNN they are talking to all kinds of people asking "Who's in charge? Where's the plan? Why isn't someone doing something?"

Bush's mismanagement of FEMA is well documented. The failure of the Republican Party on FEMA, flood control measures and wetland destruction that could have lessened the impact of floods could help turn the political tide in the south.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 12:21:02 PM EST

class, blacks and looting (2.00 / 0)

It's  obvious poor ghetto black lives mean  little to Bush. Oh, I am sure he is sad about the losses just as any human being would when they watch a tragic movie. But how deep does he carry their pain. Not very. After all that fetishizing of the 9-11 victims for years (and Bush couldn't even win NYC which elected a republican governor and mayor.), the rightwingers have been concerned with mocking the victims as if all of them had the means to evacuate or were secure enough to leave all their life savings behind or even had  a friends in a nearby city.

If Sugarland,TX got taken out, I wonder how Bush would have reacted.

While I think violent looters should be taken out by any means necessary, I am disturbed by the ease with which people feel any looter should be shot when even the cops are doing it. Ignorning the fact that a lot of the goods looted, inclulding the electronic items, would have been written off because of the storm damage, would these people advocate shooting CEOs of corporations when they loot their corporations if theft is good reason to shoot someone? I have no problem with a private owner shooting looters if he is defending his store, but not in the generic manner these right wingers seem to be lusting for.

by Pravin on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 02:51:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: class, blacks and looting (3.00 / 1)

It was deliberately used term because that's the way Bush sees them. Get off the trivial bullshit and concentrate on the main ideas discussed in a thread.
by Pravin on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 04:01:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: class, blacks and looting (3.00 / 1)

Yet you did have plenty of time to go on a bobby jindal rant when I didnt even express any support for him. And you had plenty of time to nitpick on my terminology.
by Pravin on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 04:25:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: class, blacks and looting (3.00 / 2)

You appear to be the only one that shares your high opinion of yourself and your diaries.
by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 05:01:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: class, blacks and looting (3.00 / 0)

I cannot tolerate your sanctimony.
Pravin hit it on the head.

From one Desi to another, Pravin, I got your back
--Vik

by v2aggie2 on Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 01:30:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Metonym (3.00 / 0)

argues from authority...

As a Jew... she's an expert on all things racism-related.

As a PhD-to-be... she's an expert on all things scholarly.

Get over yourself, and get over your diaries.

(I accept your upcoming troll rating with glee... I feed on them.)

Invest in nature
by NCDem on Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 02:08:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: class, blacks and looting (none / 0)

"I believe someone such as myself with a BA in Rhetoric from Berkeley, an MA in Art History from The University of Chicago, and a PhD to come in Art History from The University of Chicago knows the definition of 'hubris'."
--Metonym PhD-to-be

I JUST LOVE THAT QUOTE!

Metonym PhD-to-be, in her mountain-top sermons... attempting to impress you with big words she just googled... sometimes doesn't get her verb tenses quite right.

"For else to reaffirm racism then by reinscribe the difference one ostensibly is contesting?"
-- Metonym PhD-to-be

My 2nd favorite quote.

Invest in nature
by NCDem on Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 02:21:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: class, blacks and looting (none / 0)

Racial epithets?  You've got to be kidding!

As for the "Desi" comment, well, you attacked Pravin exactly based on his race -- by stating that he is a Jindal supporter basically who would blindly support another Indian-American politically regardless.  Obviously, it is not true.  As someone who empathizes with dealing with such a crap allegation, I lent my support to Pravin.  I have defended and supported many others at this site -- including you (see your diary on Nagin, Blanco, Landrieu)

by v2aggie2 on Sat Sep 03, 2005 at 01:26:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Tax Cuts Anyone? (none / 0)


I wonder if anyone who actually benefited from the Bush tax cuts realizes exactly what that money was for. How can people moan and groan about taxes and then act surprised when there is not enough for Hurricane Relief? And someone tell me, how exactly can anyone with a straight face say there are more than enough National Guard troops in the area where they are needed the most. Maybe they just don't realize what the National Guard is for.  http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001051313

Just a little more fuel for the fire at Editor & Publisher.

by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 02:15:46 PM EST

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (3.00 / 1)

At least you are having dinner tonight. I doubt if many in New Orleans or Mobile can say the same. Like police protection do you? Then pay taxes. Would you like for your children to be literate? Pay taxes. Want a strong military? Want Hurricane relief? PAY TAXES!!! No one ever said the dog of the Rabid Right  was responsible for your lot in life, but he his responsible for the results of his policies. That is something Republicans just can't seem to wrap their brains around.
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 04:04:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Considering how much (3.00 / 1)

New Orleans has contributed to the history and economic development of this country over the last 200 years, I think we can kick in a few bucks. New communities can be built with sustainability in mind, but preserving our history and culture is worth spending some tax money.
Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 04:29:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The fact is, (3.00 / 1)

the direct damage done by the hurricane wouldn't have amounted to a disaster. The work that needed doing, could have been done. Yeah, we could just shut down every city that's too close to a potential disaster, but that would destroy us economically. Ports are valuable things, and generate a lot of economic activity all the way inland. A few billion dollars is a drop in the bucket relative to the economic contribution a port like New Orleans has made to the nation.
Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 04:54:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Proof? (3.00 / 1)

Well, now, there's no way of proving that now, is there?

(Make sure each / is touching the edge of a word or it won't be seen as a tag.)

As a matter of fact, it seemed in the immediate aftermath of Katrina that the damage wasn't going to be that bad . . . and then the secondary effects started rolling in. And no, building a city below sea level isn't good judgement, and if I had a time machine I'd advise them to build on higher ground. But it's done. If you'd now like to let New Orleans drown, that's your opinion, but I think it would have been worth investing the money to save it.

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 05:39:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, (none / 0)

but you seem to be of the opinion that it's not worth the time and money to drain and rebuild the city. So what do you suggest?

"I'd still like to see (we'll never know) how much money has been looted from the programs that go back decades.   Do you suppose that's never happened?"

I'm sure it has. Let's take that number over decades and compare it to the amount that's been profiteered in bloated and fraudulent supply and reconstruction contracts in Iraq in just two years. Then let's talk about whether that kind of activity renders a project not worth completing.

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 06:16:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

All right dude, (none / 0)

I'm going to have to ask you to pick a side. You accused me of putting words in your mouth when I suggested you'd rather let the city drown. Now you're arguing against draining and rebuilding. Is there some other option?

"Yes, there has been some cases of overcharging- and if I'm not mistaken, it's been corrected."

You're mistaken. Some token repayments have been made in instances where the public pressure was too great, but by and large the overcharging and the vanishing money just floats by. There are $billions unaccounted for.

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 06:52:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I gave you a link. (none / 0)

You don't like it?

Here are four thousand more.

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 07:19:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Feeding the trolls... (3.00 / 2)

Howdy is a dishonnest Troll.

  1. Whenever you give him facts that disprove what he said, he'll change the subject.

  2. Whenever you dismantle the basics of his previous argument, he'll make some minor sub-point in your post the new issue of contention.

  3. When you finally get fed up with his debating dishonnesty and call him on it, he'll call you immature and act like an offended virgin.

If you go back and read this discussion and those in other threads you'll see this is his consistent modus operandi.

by miholo on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 08:54:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

pests (3.00 / 1)

Every single one of your points was completely dismantled. Repetition of assertion is not argumentation. And yes, sorry to say, but your sad behavior does match the common definition of a Troll.

by miholo on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:19:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Opinions... (none / 0)

...and facts ignored.

by miholo on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:24:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Opinions... (none / 0)

You couldn't name one I ignored. Anyone can read the discussion and see you do nothing other.

And didn't you already say goodbye 20 posts ago?

by miholo on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:39:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, (none / 0)

We understand that facts are a foreign concept Howdy, but I believe that even Joe Scarborough has admitted that billions of dollars in reconstruction spending has disappeared. We don't require proof that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.

Asking for links to prove 2 + 2 = 4 makes you look silly, but I guess you're used to that.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 07:12:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, (3.00 / 1)

Well isnt' that interesting. I've been wondering where your normal haunts are. Do you think I would last as long at Freeperville as you have lasted at MyDD?

I've heard rumors that Free Republic is not particularly tolerant of dissent from the Party Line. Do they allow anyone to challenge the Party Orthodoxy at Free Republic?

Inquiring minds want to know Howdy.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:00:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, (none / 0)

Gosh, Gary, I thought I had seen it all.
Howdy has to be the Troll of the Year at MyDD.
Even I've figured this one out.

Do we have a trophy for him?

by v2aggie2 on Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 01:38:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

They also used to have (3.00 / 1)

more wetlands, which soak up lots of stormwater. Somebody opened up those wetlands for development, and that water has to go somewhere.
Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 05:42:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (none / 0)

You know, I never called Republicans evil. Rabid yes, as you prove with every word you type. The Navy only recently was called. The Hurricane hit Sunday, it's Thursday and there are still people trapped in storm-ravaged areas with no way out and nowhere to go. You have the mayor begging for federal help and a president disengaged at best. You have not yet learned the true magnitude of this disaster. And by the way, there are far more useful and vitally important government programs than not. There is a shortage of RELIEF IN GENERAL for all the disadvantaged of affected areas, you would have to be blind not to see that. I wish I could live in that pretty picture Republicans like to paint, but I am stuck in the real world, and in the real world, you need to pay your damn taxes. By the way, if you don't make that much, you don't get taxed that much.
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 06:44:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (none / 0)

Getting rescues made is paramount. Perhaps you have not noticed how long it is taking to people out, or perhaps you didn't notice how few rescue helicopters and boats there are. When citizens are in peril in our own damn country, you pull out all the stops to help. That is one of the many purposes of the government. I know when the flooding came, and I know there should not be anyone left in New Orleans except emergency personnel. But that's not the case is it? We are talking about lives, and if all life is precious, Republicans need to start remembering the lives of those already born. (Not very eloquent I know, but you are a tad irritating.)  
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 07:24:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (3.00 / 1)

  1. If you have enough law enforcement, you can minimize if not eradicate lawlessness.

  2. The mayor of New Orleans is male, and a Democrat.

  3. As soon as it was evident that people should be evacuated, there are more than enough resources in this country to provide buses, boats and other means of transportation out of the city, when the levee broke (which was not finished because money earmarked for that project was diverted, I'll give you three guesses as to where) people who could not go anywhere. Response should have been swift.

  4. The security of the citizens is the responsibility of the government, and right now, the government is Republican. The Democrats can authorize much of anything with consensus.

by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 07:42:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (3.00 / 1)

You are just determined aren't you? Yes the mayor and governor bare some responsibility, but if the local government cannot or won't take care of the citizens (and I am not suggesting either) the federal government must step in. And the mayor and the governor have been begging for help since Monday. Miss those reports did you? President Clinton obviously has a hell of a lot more pull than the Senator, however, she has been fighting for the government to fully fund the levees and for Hurricane preparedness for quite some time. A little research before you make accusations. There is no way anyone should still be left in New Orleans, yet turn on your television. How much begging and pleading does that mayor have to do exactly before major and extensive rescue efforts are made? There are accounts of babies dying at the Super Dome because people did what local government told them to and went there because they could not for whatever reason get out.
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 08:38:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (none / 0)

Are you referring to my comments or Howlin' Howdy's?
by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:16:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (3.00 / 1)

What the hell does it matter how many buses they had on election night you heartless troll? I cannot believe you are actually bringing up an election in the face of all the horror staring you in the face! The governor of Mississippi is more worried about looting than the people stranded without food, water, or shelter. You sit and type how Clinton organized get out the vote efforts while there are bodies are floating in the street. CHILDREN ARE DYING! Do you care? Maybe someone could have gotten buses before the hurricane, but that hardly is making a difference now is it? There is no way people should still be there. The levee didn't break until after the hurricane by the way.
Question, if Congress and convene in the middle of the flipping night for a brain dead woman, why the hell didn't they have an emergency session today or yesterday? There is no excuse for this, and it is not the fault of the Senator or the mayor-deal with it.  

by AmericanWomanPatriot on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:26:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Maybe you've heard of Iraq (3.00 / 1)

Where / what happened to the state/locals?

The "locals" would be the members of the National Guard who are in Iraq. Let me see. Who was it who sent the local New Orleans and citizens of Louisiana who are members of the Louisiana National Guard to Iraq?

Who was that masked man? The name is right on the tip of my  tongue. It rhymes with Scaramouche.

Oh yeah! It was our Chicken Hawk President Bush! How could I forget?

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:10:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That's a really stupid comparison Howdy (3.00 / 1)

I'm told that when Mary Landrieu was in danger of losing her Senate seat, that ONE telephone call from Bill Clinton to the Jefferson parish got buses rolling to precincts and neighborhoods within 2 hours.

(1.) Clinton was President. Your own analogy suggests that Bush should have gotten the buses rolling with a single phone call.

(2.) Are you suggesting that somebody should have ordered a complete evacuation of New Orleans two days before the hurrican hit?

(3.) How many buses would it take to evacuate New Orleans?

(4.) Getting people from their homes to the polls and back is substantially different than moving them to where? Texas? Hurricane Katrina could have hit Texas instead of Louisiana. The path of a hurrican is not entirely predictable.

(5.) Should we have evacuated all three states that Hurricane Katrina hit, since we didn't know which state would be the most seriously affected?

(6.) Where do you normally hang out that they let you get away with such incredibly stupid shit? I'd really like to pay a visit. Are they all as ignorant as you are, or are you exceptionally callous and ignorant?

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:17:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Buck Stops Here (3.00 / 2)

It's the Republicans' fault.  Only Republicans.

As a matter of fact yes. The buck stops with the President and the party that controls both houses of Congress. Of course Harry Truman was a Democrat, and Democrats are far better at accepting responsibility than Republicans.

Has President Bush ever accepted responsibility for anything? Oops. I forgot. Sainted Leader never makes a mistake so he is never responsible for anything.

The buck always stops somewhere else with Republicans. Power without responsibility. Conduct without consequences.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:04:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Buck Stops Here (none / 0)

So where is this haven of free speech and tolerance for dissenting views that you hail from Howdy? Do you think they would have a chance against me in a robust open debate?
by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:27:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Buck Stops Here (3.00 / 1)

Having read the entire thread, the likelihood, of a conversation is unlikely with howdy. His or her sole function is to just take up electrons. Said this before, but I find this effort on trolls wasteful.
by bruh21 on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:49:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tax Cuts Anyone? (3.00 / 1)

I think a broad discussion of tax cuts and its implications in terms of readiness resources PRE-Katrina is totally appropriate.  Army Corps of Engineers Money was diverted to Iraq.  The CoE was working on the levee system.  It's criminal and deplorable that the President said today that no one envisioned that the levees would break.  The CoE envisioned it.  On record, no less.  
by RenaRF on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 08:12:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The image of uncle sam crying (3.00 / 1)

is sad, and beautiful. I am deeply touched by this post. Good work.

by turnerbroadcasting on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 02:33:57 PM EST

Re: The image of uncle sam crying (none / 0)

Thank you for compiling this information.  I also found a website called blogging New Orleans.
http://neworleans.metblogs.com/
by Marie Smith on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 03:18:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The image of uncle sam crying (none / 0)

Thanks - I'll check the link out as soon as my fingers stop cramping.  ;-)
by RenaRF on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 08:06:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Worst President Ever (3.00 / 1)

I couldn't find the link to In the Money at CNN, but Jack Cafferty had a question for his audience:

Has the federal government done enough to help the flood victims?

Cafferty said they got over 500 responses and not a single person thought the response was adequate. Not a single person.

A gas station in Georgia:

border=

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 03:49:21 PM EST

Re: The Worst President Ever (none / 0)

I loved both Cafferty and, surprisingly, Anderson Cooper today.  Cafferty for the reasons you note - Cooper completed bitchslapped Mary Landrieu as she attempted to congratulate Congress for coming back to session early.  Cooper flatly cut her off and talked about a dead body he had seen on the street for two days that was being eaten by rats.  He was near tears.  

It pretty much captured my mood.

by RenaRF on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 08:08:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Bush Must Resign (3.00 / 2)

NYCO gets it!

Bush Must Resign

The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 11:46:39 PM EST

Re: Bush Must Resign (3.00 / 2)

But it says resiging would be "the civilized" thing to do. I don't think President Obvious is civilized.
by Gary Boatwright on Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 12:40:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Even Tim Russert joins the anti-Bush chorus (none / 0)

Of all people, Tim Russert is now denouncing the lame federal rsponse to Katrina and pointing out the obvious reason-the haves and the have nots:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5961048/

by MichiganDemocrat on Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 04:26:23 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.